• What we do

    Change Focused

    Stopharper.org is non-partisan in that it promotes no single party as an alternative to the Harper Conservatives.

    Read More
  • How to host

    We give you the content

    How to get the conversation going in your community like a door knocking event but you stay in one spot.

    Read More

| October 7, 2015

The Obama administration pulled out all the stops to wrap up the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations last week. Trade ministers, including Canada's Ed Fast, were summoned to Atlanta for a final session.

The participation of Fast was controversial back in Canada, where a federal election campaign is in full swing. Concluding a sweeping, still-secret trade treaty on the brink of election day is unprecedented and arguably illegitimate.

Parliamentary convention dictates that caretaker governments refrain from taking major policy steps during an election. The sitting government is also obliged to fully consult with opposition leaders on any such decisions, but there's no sign this has occurred.

We were reminded of this when the Privy Council Office posted the guidelines for the caretaker period just before the writ dropped. They included a passage, absent in previous versions, stating "there may be compelling reasons for continued participation by Ministers and/or officials in specific activities such as treaty negotiations."

This conveniently timed insertion hardly gets government off the hook. The caretaker convention authorizes interim governments to act in real emergencies like the Syrian refugee crisis, where events are truly beyond Canada's control. They do not provide cover where political expediency is the driving factor.

The Obama administration was keen to burnish its legacy by delivering a major trade deal. There was no reason for Canada to play by this opportunistic U.S. timeframe. Even though an agreement was hammered out in Atlanta, the president must give Congress 90 days' notice before signing anything, and that only starts the legislative clock ticking. Congressional consideration would extend well into 2016, making the TPP a political football during the U.S. elections.

The Canadian government could have argued for a postponement of the Atlanta meeting. More time would have allowed whoever forms the next government to be fully briefed and properly consider the myriad issues. Until then, Canada could have been represented by senior officials charged with defending the country's interests but refraining from final commitments.

But far from arguing for a delay, the Conservative government appeared eager to drop a TPP bombshell into the final weeks of the federal campaign. New Zealand's veteran Trade Minister Tim Groser recently told his country's media that "The Canadians are negotiating as if there's no election."

Whatever one's position on this sweeping deal, there are no prospects for a fair, informed debate before the election. The Conservative government will be in full control of information about the text, and free to spin it to its own partisan advantage.

This would not be the first time this government has run roughshod over constitutional convention. Prorogation of Parliament, contempt of Parliament, misleading Parliament, omnibus budget bills … the list of abuses is long.

There are political risks in such Machiavellian maneuverings. Atlanta was not an easy meeting. Negotiators admit that some thorny issues, including market access for dairy and content rules for the auto industry, were not within reach of a clear solution.

At the last meeting, the U.S. secretly cut a side deal with Japan to allow Japanese and other automakers to sell cars and parts with high levels of Chinese content duty free in North America, undercutting the Canadian and Mexican industries. Economist Jim Stanford estimates this could cost the Canadian auto sector 24,600 jobs.

With energy and commodity prices in the gutter, many Canadians understand it is not a good time to be sacrificing well-paying jobs or weakening struggling manufacturers that are the main hope for reviving our stagnant economy.

These high-profile issues are just the tip of the iceberg. The TPP could mean major changes in matters ranging from access to medicines to the weakening of privacy protections. Unfortunately, there is no way these and other potential surprises buried in the massive text will be properly aired in the closing days of the campaign.

Striking a TPP deal during the election flies in the face of democratic convention and the government's own promises of openness. Canada's negotiating partners must understand the current government does not have the authority to commit to this trade treaty.

Whoever forms the next government must make their own decisions, in consultation with the Canadian public, and should not feel bound by whatever was agreed in Atlanta.

Scott Sinclair is Senior Trade Researcher with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives and the director of the CCPA's Trade and Investment Research Project. This op-ed was first published in theToronto Star.

Photo: SumOfUs/flickr